top of page
“ We are all in this together - whether we like it or not ”
The Multi-Polar Trap
a system of incentives where individually rational actions for differential advantange in the short-term lead to collectively adverse outcomes in the long-term; where competing actors are incentivised into a "race to the bottom" that nobody wills but no one can unilaterally stop; a "bad Nash equilibrium" where no single actor can improve their situation by changing their strategy alone, so all actors remain locked in a suboptimal dynamic; the massively multiplayer negative-sum game that is techno-capitalist civilisation in the 21st century; the nexus of game-theoretic interactions that is now exhibiting emergent agency in the direction of dystopia or oblivion.
Prominent Frames
Moloch (Alexander): In modern systems theory (popularized by Scott Alexander), Moloch is the personification of coordination failure. It represents a system where individual incentives are misaligned with the collective good, forcing participants to sacrifice values (such as safety, ethics, or happiness) to win a competitive advantage. It is the force that dictates, "If I don't do this harmful thing, my competitor will, and I will perish."
Multi-polar Trap (Alexander): This is a game-theoretic scenario involving many agents rather than just two. In a multi-polar trap, if even one agent chooses a "defect" strategy (e.g., developing a dangerous technology or polluting for profit) to gain an edge, all other agents are forced to follow suit to avoid being outcompeted or destroyed. It creates a state where everyone engages in behavior that nobody actually wants, simply to survive the competition.
Parallel Concepts
Hobbesian Trap: Also known as Schelling’s Dilemma or the Trap of Pre-emptive Strikes, this explains violence born of fear rather than malice. Two parties may wish for peace, but because neither can fully trust the other not to attack, and because striking first offers a massive strategic advantage, both are rationally incentivized to attack preemptively. It is a spiral of mutual fear leading to unnecessary conflict.
Goliath Trap (Kemp): Goliath traps are destructive competitive loops that dominance hierarchies inevitably fall into, where the pursuit of short-term elite advantage leads to long-term collective ruin. These traps manifest primarily in three forms: arms races (accumulating weapons for security), status races (conspicuous consumption to signal power), and races to the bottom (cutting standards to maximize profit). These dynamics lock societies into paths of "evolutionary suicide," preventing them from solving existential threats like climate change or nuclear proliferation.
Darwinian Trap (Ronn) : This is a specific type of misalignment between selection and value. It describes a system where natural selection (in biology, markets, or politics) favors traits that increase "fitness" (ability to replicate and persist) but actively destroy "value" (well-being, truth, or cooperation). The trap is that agents—whether humans, companies, or AIs—cannot unilaterally choose to be "good" or "safe" because the environment actively selects against those traits. If you prioritize safety over speed, you don't just lose; you are replaced by a competitor who didn't, leaving the future populated only by the ruthless.
Related Game-Theory
(Evolutionary) Prisoner's Dilemma (Wilberg): this is not a static game but a dynamic "race to the bottom". It describes a system that acts as a filter, inevitably sliding toward the "absolute zero" of cooperation. In this dynamic, if sacrificing a common value (like safety or ethics) offers a competitive advantage, the system will eventually force all surviving agents to make that sacrifice. It is a "downhill flow" where the only stable state is one where every possible corner has been cut, and any agent attempting to hold the moral high ground has been filtered out of existence.
Race to the Bottom (General Systems Dynamic): the mechanism of downregulation In a general systems context, this is the competitive shedding of complexity and redundancy. When multiple systems compete for a single metric (like speed or efficiency), any internal component that does not directly contribute to that metric is treated as "drag." Protective measures, safety buffers, ethical checks, and "slack" are systematically stripped away because they cost time or resources. The system converges on a state of maximum fragility, where agents are lean, hyper-optimized for the immediate metric, and entirely devoid of the resilience needed to survive a shock.
Tragedy of the Commons: This concept describes a situation where individuals act independently according to their own self-interest and deplete a shared resource, contrary to the long-term best interests of the whole group. Because the resource (e.g., a pasture, the ocean, the atmosphere) is open to all, every individual is incentivized to take as much as possible before others do, leading to the resource's inevitable collapse.
Arm's Race: an Arms Race is a competitive dynamic where two or more parties increase their military or technological capability to gain superiority. However, because the opponent matches every increase, the relative power balance remains the same (zero-sum), while the costs and risks for both sides increase drastically. The players end up less secure and poorer, despite having "more" weapons.
The Security Dilemma (alt: The Spiral Model): Fundamental to International Relations, this dilemma posits that actions taken by a state to increase its own security (such as strengthening alliances or building defenses) are inevitably perceived as threatening by other states. This causes the other states to respond with their own buildup, leading to a cycle of escalation where the original state actually ends up less secure than when it started.
The Red Queen Effect: Derived from Alice in Wonderland ("It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place"), this implies that in a competitive evolutionary system, an organism must constantly adapt and evolve just to survive against ever-evolving opposing organisms (predators, parasites, or competitors). Stagnation equals extinction; progress is required not to get ahead, but simply to maintain the status quo.
bottom of page